Author: Oliver Bendel

Posted on

Inclusive AI and Inclusive Robotics are Highly Valued

At CES 2026, some of the most compelling examples of Inclusive AI and Inclusive Robotics came not from consumer gadgets, but from European assistive technologies designed to expand human autonomy. This was reported by FAZ and other media outlets in January 2026. These innovations show how AI-driven perception and robotics can be centered on accessibility – and still scale beyond niche use cases. Romanian startup Dotlumen exemplifies Inclusive AI through its “.lumen Glasses for the Blind,” a wearable system that replaces a guide dog with real-time, on-device intelligence. Using multiple cameras, sensors, and GPU-based computer vision, the glasses interpret sidewalks, obstacles, and spatial structures and translate them into intuitive haptic signals. The company calls this approach “Pedestrian Autonomous Driving” – a concept that directly bridges human navigation and mobile robotics. Notably, the same algorithms are now being adapted for autonomous delivery robots, underscoring the overlap between assistive AI and broader robotic autonomy. A complementary approach comes from France-based Artha (Seehaptic), whose haptic belt uses AI-powered scene understanding to convert visual space into tactile feedback. By shifting navigation cues from sound to touch, the system reduces cognitive load and leverages sensory substitution – an inclusive design principle with implications for human-machine interfaces in robotics. Together, these technologies illustrate a European model of Inclusive AI: privacy-preserving, embodied, and focused on real-world autonomy. What begins as assistive tech increasingly becomes a foundation for the next generation of intelligent, human-centered robotics (Photo: ETH Zürich, CYBATHLON/Alessandro della Bella).

Posted on

SETI Instead of METI

As part of the ToBIT event series at the FHNW School of Business, four students of Prof. Dr. Oliver Bendel explored four topics related to his field of research during the Fall 2025/2026 semester: “The decoding of symbolic languages of animals”, “The decoding of animal body language”, “The decoding of animal facial expressions and behavior”, and “The decoding of extraterrestrial languages”. The students presented their papers on January 9, 2026. In some cases, the state of research was not only reviewed, but an independent position was also developed. The paper “The decoding of extraterrestrial languages” by Ilija Bralic argues that Messaging Extraterrestrial Intelligence (METI), in contrast to passive SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence), creates a dangerous imbalance between humanity’s rapidly expanding technical capacity to send interstellar messages and its limited ethical, scientific, and political ability to govern this power responsibly. The central thesis is that the moral justifications for METI are speculative and anthropocentric, relying largely on optimistic assumptions about extraterrestrial behavior, while the potential risks are severe, logically grounded, and potentially existential. These risks include fundamental misinterpretation caused by the “human lens,” strategic dangers described by the Dark Forest hypothesis, historical patterns of harm in technologically asymmetric encounters, and profound cultural, psychological, and political disruption. The paper concludes that unilateral METI decisions by individuals or private groups are ethically indefensible and that, under the Precautionary Principle, humanity should immediately halt active transmissions. As a solution, it proposes a binding international governance framework, including a temporary global moratorium, the creation of a dedicated international authority, a strict multi-stage decision-making protocol, and robust transparency and monitoring mechanisms. This approach frames responsible restraint – not transmission – as humanity’s first genuine test of cosmic maturity.

Posted on

AI and Human Creativity

As part of the AAAI Spring Symposia, the symposium “Will AI Light Up Human Creativity or Replace It?: Toward Well-Being AI for co-evolving human and machine intelligence” focuses on how advances in generative AI, large language models, and multi-agent systems are transforming human creativity and decision-making. It addresses the central question of whether AI will amplify human potential or increasingly take its place. The symposium advances the idea of Well-Being AI, emphasizing human-AI collaboration and co-evolution rather than AI as an isolated or autonomous system. While highlighting the potential of AI to support creativity, discovery, and personal development, it also examines risks such as overreliance, reduced diversity of thought, and loss of human autonomy. Chaired by Takashi Kido (see photo) of Teikyo University and Keiki Takadama of The University of Tokyo, the symposium brings together researchers and practitioners from technical, philosophical, and social disciplines to discuss principles and frameworks for AI that augments rather than replaces human creativity. Further information on this symposium and the broader AAAI Spring Symposia organized by the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence can be found at https://aaai.org/conference/spring-symposia/sss26/ and webpark2506.sakura.ne.jp/aaai/sss26-will-ai-light-up-human-creativity-or-replace-it/.

Posted on

Talking to a Robot

The article “Small Talk with a Robot Reduces Stress and Improves Mood” by Katharina Kühne, Antonia L. Z. Klöffel, Oliver Bendel, and Martin H. Fischer was published on December 23, 2025. It is part of the volume “Social Robotics + AI: 17th International Conference, ICSR+AI 2025, Naples, Italy, September 10–12, 2025, Proceedings, Part III.” From the abstract: “Research has demonstrated that social support is crucial in mitigating stress and enhancing mood. Not only do long-term, meaningful relationships contribute to well-being, but everyday social interactions, such as small talk, also offer psychological benefits. As social robots increasingly become more integrated into daily life, they present a potential avenue for stress interventions. In our online study, 98 participants underwent a stress induction using the Stroop task and were then assigned to one of three conditions: engaging in scripted small talk with a simulated NAO robot online, listening to a neutral story told by the same NAO robot, or no intervention (control condition). Results indicate that both interventions effectively reduced stress, with a tendency towards a stronger effect in the Small talk condition. Small talk not only helped maintain positive affect but also reduced negative affect. Notably, the benefits were more pronounced among individuals experiencing higher acute stress following the stress induction, but were less evident in those with chronically elevated stress levels. Furthermore, the effect of the intervention on stress reduction was mediated by changes in positive affect. These findings suggest that small talk with a social robot may serve as a promising tool for stress reduction and affect regulation.” The first author, a researcher from the University of Potsdam, presented the paper on September 12, 2025, in Naples. It can be downloaded from link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-95-2398-6_1.

Posted on

Robots in Space

The article “Wearable Social Robots in Space” by Tamara Siegmann and Oliver Bendel was published on December 23, 2025. It is part of the volume “Social Robotics + AI: 17th International Conference, ICSR+AI 2025, Naples, Italy, September 10–12, 2025, Proceedings, Part I.” From the abstract: “Social robots have been developed on Earth since the 1990s. This article shows that they can also provide added value in space – particularly on a manned flight to Mars. The focus in this paper is on wearable social robots, which seem to be an obvious type due to their small size and low weight. First, the environment and situation of the astronauts are described. Then, using AIBI as an example, it is shown how it fits into these conditions and requirements and what tasks it can perform. Possible further developments and improvements of a wearable social robot are also mentioned in this context. It becomes clear that a model like AIBI is well suited to accompany astronauts on a Mars flight. However, further developments and improvements in interaction and communication are desirable before application.” The Swiss student presented the paper together with her professor on September 10, 2025, in Naples. It can be downloaded from link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-95-2379-5_33.

Posted on

Towards Inclusive AI and Inclusive Robotics

The article “Wearable Social Robots for the Disabled and Impaired” by Oliver Bendel was published on December 23, 2025. It is part of the volume “Social Robotics + AI: 17th International Conference, ICSR+AI 2025, Naples, Italy, September 10–12, 2025, Proceedings, Part III.” From the abstract: “Wearable social robots can be found on a chain around the neck, on clothing, or in a shirt or jacket pocket. Due to their constant availability and responsiveness, they can support the disabled and impaired in a variety of ways and improve their lives. This article first identifies and summarizes robotic and artificial intelligence functions of wearable social robots. It then derives and categorizes areas of application. Following this, the opportunities and risks, such as those relating to privacy and intimacy, are highlighted. Overall, it emerges that wearable social robots can be useful for this group, for example, by providing care and information anywhere and at any time. However, significant improvements are still needed to overcome existing shortcomings.” The technology philosopher presented the paper on September 12, 2025, in Naples. It can be downloaded from link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-95-2398-6_8.

Posted on

The Rise of General-purpose Robots

The paper “The Universal Robot of the 21st Century” by Oliver Bendel was published in February 2025 in the proceedings volume “Social Robots with AI: Prospects, Risks, and Responsible Methods” … From the abstract: “Developments in several areas of computer science, robotics, and social robotics make it seem likely that a universal robot will be available in the foreseeable future. Large language models for communication, perception, and control play a central role in this. This article briefly outlines the developments in the various areas and uses them to create the overall image of the universal robot. It then discusses the associated challenges from an ethical and social science perspective. It can be said that the universal robot will bring with it new possibilities and will perhaps be one of the most powerful human tools in physical space. At the same time, numerous problems are foreseeable, individual, social, and ecological.” The proceedings volume comprises the papers presented at Robophilosophy 2024 in Aarhus. Leading philosophers, computer scientists and roboticists met there in August. Like the ICSR, the conference is one of the world’s leading conferences on social robotics. General-purpose robots, the predecessors of universal robots, have now become widespread, as exemplified by Digit, Apollo, and Figure 03. The author accepted manuscript of this article is therefore being made freely available on this site for non-commercial use only and with no derivatives, in line with the publisher’s self-archiving policy.

Posted on

Paper on “Robots in Policing”

In January 2023, the Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2022 were published. Included is the paper “Robots in Policing” by Oliver Bendel. From the abstract: “This article is devoted to the question of how robots are used in policing and what opportunities and risks arise in social terms. It begins by briefly explaining the characteristics of modern police work. It puts service robots and social robots in relation to each other and outlines relevant disciplines. The article also lists types of robots that are and could be relevant in the present context. It then gives examples from different countries of the use of robots in police work and security services. From these, it derives the central tasks of robots in this area and their most important technical features. A discussion from social, ethical, and technical perspectives seeks to provide clarity on how robots are changing the police as a social institution and with social actions and relationships, and what challenges need to be addressed.” (Abstract) Robots and AI systems in police work have become a hot topic. The author accepted manuscript of this article is therefore being made freely available on this site for non-commercial use only and with no derivatives, in line with the publisher’s self-archiving policy.

Posted on

Navel, please come to me

Contact between Navel Robotics and the FHNW School of Business has existed since March 2021. At that time, it had not yet been decided whether Navel, the social robot, should be equipped with a spherical body or with wheels for locomotion. Claude Toussaint, the founder and inventor, discussed this and other questions with Prof. Dr. Oliver Bendel. He decided in favor of wheels, unlike the Mirokaï models by Enchanted Tools – the female Miroka and the male Miroki – which today zip around like BB-8. Navel stands out for its large, seemingly round eyes. This effect is created by a special lens, as the displays themselves are not curved. In the case of the Mirokaï robots, the face – including eyes, nose, mouth, and facial expressions – is projected onto a face shell, similar to the Furhat heads. The contact between the company and the university continued. On February 18, 2024, Claude Toussaint joined the elective module “Social Robots” remotely, and on June 6, 2024, he was a guest at the Future Lab hosted by Oliver Bendel at Learntec. In November 2025, Navel Robotics was able to announce on its website: “Many customers have been waiting for this moment – we have too … From now on, Navel will gradually learn to move independently in environments such as stations and residential areas. ‘Navel, please come to me’ – the first step toward autonomous driving.” (Navel Robotics website, own translation) In nursing homes and assisted-living facilities, social robots of this kind can be useful, as can assistive robots such as Lio, which are capable of physically manipulating objects. Miroka and Miroki combine both worlds: they are advanced assistive robots and fully fledged social robots. The future will show which approaches prevail (Photo: ICSR).

Posted on

Human-likeness in AI

The Research Topic “Exploring human-likeness in AI: From perception to ethics and interaction dynamics”, hosted by Frontiers in Cognition, invites contributions on how human-like features in robots and AI systems influence user perception, trust, interaction, and ethical considerations. The deadline for submission has been extended. As AI becomes more integrated into society, anthropomorphic design raises pressing questions: Do human-like traits improve communication and acceptance, or do they lead to unrealistic expectations? What ethical implications arise when machines simulate empathy or emotion? This interdisciplinary call welcomes contributions from fields such as psychology, engineering, philosophy, and education. Submissions may include empirical research, theoretical analysis, reviews, or case studies that explore how human-likeness shapes the way we engage with AI. The deadline for manuscript summaries is February 12, 2026; full manuscripts are due by March 12, 2026. Articles will undergo peer review and are subject to publication fees upon acceptance. Topic editors are Dr. Katharina Kühne (University of Potsdam, Germany) and Prof. Dr. Roger K. Moore (The University of Sheffield, United Kingdom). For full details and submission guidelines, visit: www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/72370/exploring-human-likeness-in-ai-from-perception-to-ethics-and-interaction-dynamics.