A 16-year-old girl in Cologne was allegedly sexually harassed by means of a humanoid robot. According to an October 12, 2026, press release issued by Cologne police, the approximately 4-foot-tall, red-and-gold robot approached the teenager from behind outside a fast-food restaurant early Sunday morning, touched her buttocks, and made thrusting motions. The robot’s 16-year-old owner, from Wegberg, and his 19-year-old companion allegedly filmed the incident, livestreamed it on social media, and provided commentary. Police officers responding to the incident located those involved shortly afterward and discovered the robot, which had since been stowed in the trunk of a Volkswagen. Officers seized the robot and two cell phones. The robot may have been a Unitree R1 manufactured by the Chinese company Unitree Robotics. The model, which stands approximately 4 feet tall (1.23 meters), can be remotely controlled and programmed to perform specific sequences of movements. Its identity has not yet been confirmed. Criminal investigators are investigating the incident on suspicion of sexually motivated insult, an offense under German law. A key question is whether the robot’s movements were deliberately controlled at the time of the incident.
Can Robots and AI Systems Be Creative?
Can robots and AI systems be creative? Since the rise of generative AI, this question has been the subject of intense debate. The issue is not merely whether machines can produce images, texts, or music. It is also about what we understand by creativity and art in the first place, and whether they are necessarily tied to human beings. The Biennale Arte 2026 could have been an excellent place to engage in this debate. In fact, it does so only occasionally. In the Chinese Pavilion, the humanoid robot Astribot S1 writes in the style of calligraphy master Wang Dongling. Visitors can take the works of art, if that is what they are, home with them. Zhang Zhoujie, meanwhile, has computers develop forms for his “digital chairs” based on predefined rules. The designer tries to exercise as little control as possible, giving the computer a degree of creative freedom of its own. In the Venice Pavilion, “Echo/SommersiVo” uses artificial intelligence to translate visitors’ memories and impressions into a constantly changing world of sound and images. Those involved explicitly describe the process as a collaboration between humans and AI in the creative process. These are interesting approaches, but they remain exceptions. At a time when generative AI is challenging our understanding of authorship, originality, and creativity, the world’s most important international exhibition of contemporary art barely addresses this development. The Biennale Arte 2026 did not have to answer the question of whether machines can be creative. But it should have asked it.
A Decade Before Article 50: AI Transparency in the European Parliament
Article 50, “Transparency obligations for providers and deployers of certain AI systems,” of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) states: “Providers shall ensure that AI systems intended to interact directly with natural persons are designed and developed in such a way that the natural persons concerned are informed that they are interacting with an AI system, unless this is obvious from the point of view of a natural person who is reasonably well-informed, observant and circumspect, taking into account the circumstances and the context of use.” Ten years earlier, the European Parliament had already sought advice from Oliver Bendel on this very topic. In his presentation, “Moral and Immoral Machines”, delivered at the event “Merging of Man and Machine: Questions of Ethics in Dealing with Emerging Technology” in Brussels on September 8, 2016, Bendel introduced GOODBOT, a chatbot he had initiated in 2013 as part of his research on machine ethics. GOODBOT featured several escalation levels and repeatedly made it clear to users that it was merely a machine. Other speakers in the “Ethics & Society” session included Enno Park, Dana Lewis, Yvonne Hofstetter, and Constanze Kurz. At the “Digital Europe” Working Group conference on robotics on November 8, 2017, Bendel also spoke online about related issues in machine ethics. Referring to a care robot, he raised the question: “Should the robot make clear that it’s just a machine?” The transparency obligations set out in Article 50 entered into force on August 2, 2026 (Photo: Sebastian Raible).
ICSR + Art 2026: Programme Highlights
The 18th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR + Art 2026) will take place in London, UK, from 1–4 July 2026. ICSR is the leading international forum that brings together researchers, academics, and industry professionals from across disciplines to advance the field of social robotics. The preliminary programme, now available, offers four days of scientific exchange, artistic exploration, and community building, featuring keynote lectures, paper presentations, special sessions, workshops, debates, a Grand Challenge, exhibitions, and a variety of networking opportunities. Reflecting the conference theme ICSR + Art, the programme highlights the growing intersections between social robotics and creative practice through events such as the Robot Fringe Festival, the Rising Stars in Social Robotics event, the premiere performance of Quantwin by Silke Grabinger, the 1001 Nights with Robots Show, Argos, and the Robot Fashion Show, while also covering the full breadth of contemporary social robotics research. Participants will have opportunities to engage with leading experts from academia, industry, healthcare, design, the arts, and other fields. Full details of the programme are available at icsr2026.uk/programme/.
Off the Record
After generative AI, robotics is the topic of the moment – and, of course, the two can be combined. On May 21, 2026, Walder Wyss hosted a robotics event at Kraftwerk Zurich as part of its “Off the Record” series, beginning at 6:00 p.m. Friends and clients of the law firm were invited to attend. The discussion covered traditional service robots as well as general-purpose robots—and social robots. The panel featured Prof. Dr. Oliver Bendel, a philosopher of technology and business information systems scholar who has been working extensively with chatbots, voice assistants, and social robots for decades, and Sylvia Stocker, CEO of Arabesque. The event was moderated by Ramona Wyss and Florian Gunz. Since May 27, 2026, photographs from the event have been available. They feature not only the speakers and moderators but also several of the robots present at the venue, including Unitree G1, Mars, and Pepper. In its corporate brochure, the law firm describes itself as follows: “We are a dynamic law firm with flat structures and a very friendly atmosphere. More than 300 legal experts make Walder Wyss one of the most successful Swiss commercial law firms. Our clients include national and international companies, publicly held corporations and family businesses as well as public law institutions and individuals.” (Photo: Walder Wyss)
Robot Runners Close In on Human Records
According to an article by Golem from April 19, 2026, humanoid robots beat human runners for the first time in a half marathon in Beijing, where a remotely controlled robot named Lightning (Blitz) from Honor initially finished first despite a fall but received a time penalty, resulting in an adjusted time of about 57 minutes, while the actual win went to an autonomous version of Lightning that completed the race in 50 minutes and 26 seconds, significantly improving on previous robot records and approaching the human world record. The event, which saw a sharp increase in participating teams and several robots struggling or crashing, reflects China’s strong investment in robotics and embodied AI, and experts note that such competitions primarily serve as rigorous tests to advance endurance, energy efficiency, and system reliability in robotics, with potential future applications in service, elderly care, and dangerous environments rather than long-distance running itself.
From CLEANINGFISH to Gillbert
A student at the University of Surrey proposed a fish-like robot called Gillbert in the context of a university robotics contest, suggesting a system that could move through water and capture microplastics using a gill-inspired filter. The concept was subsequently developed into a 3D-printed research prototype by a university team. The robot mimics fish locomotion via a flexible tail and is designed to collect particles of up to around 2 mm, primarily for monitoring and experimental purposes rather than large-scale cleanup. The project was published as open source. The idea follows earlier conceptual work such as the CLEANINGFISH design study by Prof. Dr. Oliver Bendel (2014), which envisioned small robotic fish operating individually or in swarms to remove plastic and debris from aquatic environments and transport it to collection points, including objects located on the ground. This concept was further examined in 2015 within a project at the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW), where increasing plastic pollution in seemingly clean waters and its ecological and human impact were analyzed. Oliver Bendel and his student concluded that robotic fish could interfere with aquatic life and were not sufficiently efficient for practical large-scale deployment, while also raising questions in machine and technology ethics. Gillbert can be understood as a contemporary experimental continuation of these earlier ideas under improved technological and collaborative conditions.
Human-likeness in AI
The Research Topic “Exploring human-likeness in AI: From perception to ethics and interaction dynamics”, hosted by Frontiers in Cognition, invites contributions on how human-like features in robots and AI systems influence user perception, trust, interaction, and ethical considerations. The deadline for submission has been extended. As AI becomes more integrated into society, anthropomorphic design raises pressing questions: Do human-like traits improve communication and acceptance, or do they lead to unrealistic expectations? What ethical implications arise when machines simulate empathy or emotion? This interdisciplinary call welcomes contributions from fields such as psychology, engineering, philosophy, and education. Submissions may include empirical research, theoretical analysis, reviews, or case studies that explore how human-likeness shapes the way we engage with AI. The deadline for manuscript summaries is February 12, 2026; full manuscripts are due by March 12, 2026. Articles will undergo peer review and are subject to publication fees upon acceptance. Topic editors are Dr. Katharina Kühne (University of Potsdam, Germany) and Prof. Dr. Roger K. Moore (The University of Sheffield, United Kingdom). For full details and submission guidelines, visit: www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/72370/exploring-human-likeness-in-ai-from-perception-to-ethics-and-interaction-dynamics.
How Human-Like Should It Be?
The Research Topic “Exploring human-likeness in AI: From perception to ethics and interaction dynamics”, hosted by Frontiers in Cognition, invites submissions on how human-like features in robots and AI systems influence user perception, trust, interaction, and ethical considerations. As AI becomes more integrated into society, anthropomorphic design raises pressing questions: Do human-like traits improve communication and acceptance, or do they lead to unrealistic expectations? What ethical implications arise when machines simulate empathy or emotion? This interdisciplinary call welcomes contributions from fields such as psychology, engineering, philosophy, and education. Submissions may include empirical research, theoretical analysis, reviews, or case studies that explore how human-likeness shapes the way we engage with AI. The deadline for manuscript summaries is September 22, 2025; full manuscripts are due by January 10, 2026. Articles will undergo peer review and are subject to publication fees upon acceptance. Topic editors are Dr. Katharina Kühne (University of Potsdam, Germany) and Prof. Dr. Roger K. Moore (The University of Sheffield, United Kingdom). For full details and submission guidelines, visit: www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/72370/exploring-human-likeness-in-ai-from-perception-to-ethics-and-interaction-dynamics.
About Inclusive Robotics
The Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon is the largest economics encyclopedia in the German-speaking world. In March 2025, Oliver Bendel published an article on inclusive robotics in this reference work. The first part reads as follows: “Inclusive robotics designs, develops, controls, manufactures, and operates robotic solutions for individuals with disabilities or impairments. The goal is to enable them to fully participate in social life and to engage in education, culture, and sports. This can involve the replacement or enhancement of a body part, as well as the use of a robot that provides assistance (an assistive robot or companion robot) or is worn on or with the body (a wearable robot). Robotic quadrupeds and bipedal general-purpose robots are becoming increasingly relevant. In the future, these will function as universal robots – true generalists. Inclusive Robotics addresses not only physical aspects but also psychological ones. It is closely related to inclusive AI.” The full article is available at: wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/definition/inclusive-robotics-172663 (Photo; ETH Zurich, Cybathlon/Alessandro Della Bella).
